DOT Logo

U.S. Department
of Transportation
Federal Transit
Administration
Office of Safety and Security

FTA Drug And Alcohol Regulation Updates

Spring 1998

Issue 8

Introduction....

     The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) published its final rules on prohibited drug use (49 CFR Part 653) and the prevention of alcohol misuse (49 CFR Part 654) on February 15, 1994. Shortly thereafter, the FTA published the Implementation Guidelines for Drug and Alcohol Regulations in Mass Transit to provide a comprehensive overview of the regulations.
     Since the Guidelines were published there have been numerous amendments, interpretations, and clarifications to the Drug and Alcohol testing procedures and program requirements.
     This publication is being provided to update the Guidelines and inform your transit system of all of these changes. This Update is the eighth in a series.

Inside....

FTA Provides Checklists
    
In an effort to assist recipients/sub-recipients and their contractors and vendors in their program monitoring and assessment activities, FTA will be providing checklists on each of the major components of the testing program. The checklists will be published in this and subsequent issues of the Updates. The checklists can be used as a self-assessment tool to identify incorrect or omitted components of a program or as an oversight tool to assess compliance. A checklist for policies is provided on pages 3 and 4 of this Update.

State Oversight
    
The regulations (49 CFR Parts 653.83 and 654.83) require that the states certify compliance with the FTA drug and alcohol testing program on behalf of the Section 5311 and 5307 transit programs they administer. They are also required to collect annual MIS forms from each sub-recipient and their contractors and submit them to FTA. FTA does not specify what actions must be taken by states to ensure sub-recipients’ compliance, but states are encouraged to develop an oversight program that will provide a reasonable confidence level that their sub-recipients are in compliance before they certify compliance. Successful oversight activities have included policy reviews, on-going training, technical assistance, and compliance checklists.
     Among the most informative tools is the policy review. Several states evaluate policies of each of their sub-recipients to ensure that every system has a policy in place and to assess the policy content for compliance. Some states have reviewed the policies using a checklist similar to the one provided in this Update. The states that have performed those reviews have found them to be very useful because they often reveal the nature and extent of a sub-recipient’s compliance problems.


Example of a Proactive State Oversight Program

  • Policy Reviews

  • On-going Training and Information Dissemination

  • Compliance Checklist with Documentation

  • On-going Technical Assistance

     Information sharing and training is another effective oversight tool. Most states have provided some level of training for their subrecipients. A few states have supplemented their initial training by providing refresher courses aimed at informing sub-recipients of regulatory changes, new interpretations, and ways to avoid common mistakes. Several states have also developed resource libraries that are available to sub-recipients and have disseminated information through newsletters, alerts, e-mails, or faxes.
     Some states have developed monitoring programs that require sub-recipients to complete comprehensive checklists and provide documentation indicating how they complied with each regulatory requirement. A review of the checklists enables the state to identify problems and require the sub-recipients to take corrective actions. Other states have included abbreviated testing program checklists into their on-going regulatory compliance review processes.
     Regardless of the methods used, each state should be committed to the program and should take their oversight responsibilities seriously. Oversight programs that successfully identify problem areas, and initiate corrective actions will enhance the integrity of each sub-recipient’s testing program, minimize compliance issues, avoid potential legal conflicts and improve the overall effectiveness of the program.

[Next Page]